Xcp: Streetnotes: Ethnography, Poetry, and the Documentary Experience . . .
     Winter  2004

Special Section:
Street as Method
Teaching documentary and observation techniques in their coursework, SIX professors exhibit their assignments and their students' work.
STREET as METHOD

Streetnotes Winter 2004

Blagovesta Momchedjikova
NYU's Tisch School of the Arts "Writing the Essay"
New York City

Jenna Noel
Solitude in the City
 
 
Central Park Lake wasn’t the most beautiful lake that I’d ever seen, but somehow, it had a force over my entire being that linked me to one of the most mesmerizing parts of a human’s mind—our memory.  One drizzly and foggy Wednesday evening, I discovered my own magical place in a vast sea of greenery submerged in the middle of Manhattan—the lake.  Much like Andre Aciman in his essay, Shadow Cities, which discusses the demolishment of Straus Park and the scariness of change in our lives and an undeniable want for things to always remain the same, with a yearning for all people, much like exiles, to find a place of familiarity and comfort, I was searching for a place to call my own in New York City, “doing what all exiles do on impulse, which is to look for their homeland abroad” (Aciman 494). 
 


 

I discovered upon repeated visits to my gorgeous haven that I wasn’t the only person in Central Park seeking a sense of home in an often cruel and bitingly harsh city.  In the picture taken above, there were dozens of people surrounding the lake that are not visible from this vantage point.  They did not hinder my emotional and calming experience that day or any other day, because it wasn’t anyone else’s spot at the lake—it was mine.  Staring out into the fiery oranges and reds that set the autumn trees aglow and the quiet, rippling waters that know the secrets of the past, of heartbreak and love, of tranquility and passion, of memory—well, it simply brought tears to my eyes.  I missed my home.  I longed for a sense of family, familiarity, and warmth that I was unable to find anywhere else in the city.  Andre Aciman argues that Straus Park was “created precisely for retrospection, for finding oneself, for finding the center of things” (497).  In my opinion, Central Park’s lake was created with the exact same purpose—to find yourself, to find humanity. 

It was my private sanctuary—my place to get away from the sounds of angry cab drivers, frantic fire engines, and bustling police.  Much like Aciman, I found that “it’s difficult to explain what seclusion means when you find it amid the roar of midday traffic” (498).  More than that, I found the calm seclusion and stillness of the park to be beautiful yet ironic.  Even in the thickening depths of the most inner part of the park, one is still able to see the New York skyline peeking out above the treetops.  Still, even with the city not being totally obsolete at this location, tourists and New Yorkers alike go to great lengths to find this secret oasis of serenity.  In order for an overwhelming majority of New Yorkers to enjoy Central Park’s tranquility and uniqueness, one must either hop in a cab or experience a subway excursion just to enjoy “nature.”  Truly, there is nothing “natural” about that.  But once you enter its passage, it’s as if you’re transported to another dimension—you are no longer in New York.  People are friendlier, it seems.  Things are quiet and peaceful, and people respect one another.  On any relatively decent day at Central Park Lake, the sites to see are endless!  You can witness a myriad of natures wonders and life’s norms including ducks, fish, geese, squirrels, joggers, film crews, dogs, people reading books, performers, artists, children, bridal parties, tourists, and the homeless—all just enjoying the beauty she has to offer.  The lake brings even the most dissimilar of people together for a common purpose—to enjoy the view, the air, and the pure beauty of the park. 

But why do we choose Central Park?  Why can’t this relaxation occur at any other park in Manhattan? And why is Central Park one of the most famous sites in New York City?  Some believe it is because of its great size, the zoo, Belvedere Castle, the carousel, Wollman ice skating rink, or Tavern on the Green restaurant.  But what I believe really draws in the crowds and differentiates this park from others is the waters of the lake. 

Water has a calming and tranquil effect on humans, believed to be linked back to our psychologically most comforting memory of all—developing in our mother’s womb before we were even born.  Today, people travel to the shore for vacations to help unwind and relax.  With wave machines, even the relaxing sound of water puts many people to sleep at night within the comfort of their own homes.   In New York City, we are inclined to go to Battery Park at the southern most tip of Manhattan or the Seaport to see the water’s edge, but to some, the immenseness of the sea can be overwhelming.  When staring out into a sunset over the horizon at the seaport or at Battery Park looking at the Statue of Liberty, we feel as if we are able to see for eternity.  Our thoughts often run away with us and are focused on travel and escape from our lives.  More intimate and reassuring thoughts are formed in a contained water source, such as the lake.  In many ways the vastness of the open sea and appearance of endless water connects us to our future, while a charming, baroque and familiar lake links us to our past and can simply capture a singular mesmeric moment of the present.  For most, a smaller and quainter park-like atmosphere can be much more inviting.  The lake calls to her visitors, beckoning them to approach her edge touch her waters.  It’s amazing how people just stand on the Bethesda Terrace and stare out at the lake as if it has magical powers or they’re expecting a mythical creature to rise from its waters.  Surely, these visitors have seen water before, but the presence of this water in this particular park is what makes its presence so unique. 
 


 

Sure, there are multiple parks in New York City for everyone to enjoy, however, few of these parks hold the placidity and harmony of Central Park.  Who wants to or who is actually capable of relaxing in nature during an anti-war  protest in Union Square,  or a drug bust or renovation in Washington Square?  And of course no one wants to be shunned away by Gramercy Park’s aristocracy and selectiveness.   Stephanie Farqhaur describes Gramercy Park as “indeed a haven, but only for a select elite” (Farqhaur 45).   Central Park is neither selective or elite, and her ambiance is unmatched.  The lake opens her arms to you and embraces you warmly in a cold and ever-changing metropolis.

Large, yet inviting, it is unlike any other park in the city.  It’s an artistic and physical phenomenon.  Feeling the need to have a comparably landscaped park to ones in London and Paris, merchants and landowners encouraged the development of the park to establish international reputation in the 19th century.  In the 1850’s, thousands of Irish, German, and New England-area laborers toiled ten-hour days for between a dollar and dollar fifty per day to complete the masterpiece known as Central Park.  Unfortunately, to the dismay of the common man, it became clear after its first decade of completion that the park had been built for the wealthy.  It was too far for the working class people living downtown to walk there.  But today, Central Park Lake knows no social class boundaries.  In fact, it’s ironic that a park that was originally built for the wealthy is literally a home and place to sleep for hundreds of homeless people today.

However, the homeless people do not even pose the thought of a threat for the parks validity, safety, or beauty.  In fact, they almost enhance it.  One Sunday afternoon, I approached a woman sitting at the edge of the Bethesda Terrace, looking across the lake, painting a picture of a raggedly dressed man sitting solitarily under a tree by the lake’s edge, and I asked her why she chose to paint this man.  “Because his existence and ambiance at this lake is beautiful.  It is people like this man that capture the true essence of what this place is about,” she replied.
 
 


 
 

I then began to question how misleading her painting would probably be.  In the picture shown above, I managed to capture a glimpse of this man that she was painting sitting under the tree.  Is this picture beautiful to you?  Perhaps, but it’s amazing how a mere picture can be so misleading—because you don’t see the same image my camera lens caught that the naked eye would see at the lake.  Because beyond the perimeters of this photo is the man’s battered shopping cart, filled with bags, clothes, and junk collected on the streets.  In the essay, Not Looking at Pictures, E.M. Forster describes how paintings often, much like my photograph “generate private fantasies…show landscapes where one would like to wander” (Forster 80).  Without the truth behind this picture, you could imagine many different stories about this man’s life.  However, the last thing that you would probably imagine is that he is homeless.  In my picture, he may be admired as just a quiet and peaceful man, relaxing under a tree.  But would you really be willing to wander up to a homeless man by himself in the park?  If you were to see this man sitting at the corner of 14th Street and Broadway in the same position with his dilapidated shopping cart, you would probably ignore his existence first before ever recognizing him as beautiful or even recognizing him at all.  Why does this lake have the ability to cloud our vision of reality and make everything so beautiful, void from all that is ugly, evil, and often honest?  Is this ability a miraculous phenomenon, or merely just an entrancing illusion of our minds? 

It may possibly be both, but either way, it is still incredible that a simple site in such a vast city can draw people from a father fishing with his son, to an elderly woman feeding the ducks, to a die hard exercise freak running its path numerous times, to a bride taking pictures of the most important day of her life, to a movie crew filming a major motion picture, to a performer earning a living with change acquired from his fluctuating audiences, to an artist attempting to capture beauty with her paint and canvas, to someone like me just trying to embrace a sense of home and solidity in a kaleidoscopic city.  I feel it would be impossible to find many other places in New York City or even the entire world that can serve so many purposes and mean so many different things to so many different people.  And even if our one-dimensional New York vision of reality is blurred for just a few moments of our hellish lives, well maybe that’s ok. There is no doubt that something about Central Park Lake is magical, mystifying, and miraculous. 
 
 
 
 
 

Works Cited

Aciman, Andre.  “Shadow Cities.”  Writing the Essay ? Art in the World ? The 
World Through Art.  Eds.  Forrest, Martin, and Pat C. Hoy II.  New York: 
McGraw-Hill Custom Publishing, 2003.  493-505.

Central Park Conservancy.  “Virtual Park.”  2003.   http://www.centralparknyc.org/virtualpark/thegreatlawn/lake/

Farqhuar, Stephanie.  “Memoirs of the City’s Unfamous.”  Mercer Street.  Eds.  Hoy II, and 
Darlene A. Forrest.  Expository Writing Program:  New York University, 2000.  45-47

Forster, E.M.  “Not Looking at Pictures.”  Writing the Essay ? Art in the World ? The 
World Through Art.  Eds.  Forrest, Martin, and Pat C. Hoy II.  New York: 
McGraw-Hill Custom Publishing, 2003.  80-82.

Waxman, Sarah.  “The History of Central Park.” http://www.ny.com/articles/centralpark.html

(c)Noel 2004

contributors' notes


The Xcp Website and Streetnotes are edited by David Michalski.
To contribute please contact  michalski@ucdavis.edu
 Xcp  is hosted by the free and proud Buffalo Freenet
All Rights Reserved (c)2004 Fly Into the Streets
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

xcp